Wednesday, May 11, 2011

Dune Buggy Frames Drawings

pharmacy + No

Sicily went bankrupt with the narrow view, stupid right part of the Mexican who wants to find in a sector, the responsibility of any one disaster, through the creation of a talismanic phrase common with right-wing propaganda. all the fault of any national disaster is political class.
all So, as said Javier Sicilia, all politicians and by extension, anyone with political positions, are the responsibility of the disaster. Thus a sentence accordingly would accompanied by a stronger, shouted by the picketers in Argentina do them all! Sicily hesitated at the enormity of his statement, and only played one of the operators of Felipe Calderón, García Luna Let him go! Those who aspired to clasepolíticacidio , shortness, advocates Wallace Calderon as they felt that he had not consulted.
"All politicians in Mexico are responsible for violence in the fight against drug trafficking? A categorical view is rarely a real trial. Can not qualify particularities universal judgments. Many politicians of course are responsible for what is happening in our country, supposedly fighting, running or even being beneficiaries of the drug. The question is whether the fallacy that all are, is not actually covering up for those who are responsible with names, hidden in the veil of a totality.
But curiously this total so assume that all are, then hide in that all those if they are responsible with names, excluding other sectors that are responsible. Not only do many politicians are responsible, are also social sectors such as businessmen who launder money, investing in that business and are direct beneficiaries, members of social organizations which may include churches, peasant leaders and trade union representatives official. And once again, to clarify, not all employers, not all church members, and all the leaders of social organizations.
What wrong of the government strategy is to combat crime, but who fights in the street, pretending that really fights it, and not fighting in the banks, employers, religious hierarchies, the politicians, corporate leaders. The dead are mostly employees and victims of organized crime and not the owners of the business. An indication that they are actually beating the organized crime we will see when starting the imprisonment of bankers, senators of the Republic, state secretaries, governors, PAN, PRI and PRD not only mayors. When a name of the mob who stole the country, associated with organized crime, displayed on billboards with a tache, as operators are now listed as the Beltran Leyva business or Teo. When they are prosecuted for their crimes senior Army or Marine involved and when the high command of the Ministry of Public Security have to do with kidnapping, drug trafficking, end their days public officials in prison.
Meanwhile, it's that "all politicians" are criminals is an alibi to hide the real size of those responsible and is not specifically directed against who has the power, but against those who do not. A Javier Sicilia, with all due respect, we should ask. Who benefits from independent citizens not to vote in the current state of affairs?
No vote is to allow the distribution the hard vote, Red PRI, PAN blue
hard Today voters from each party will not vote or by the PRD or the PRI, nor PAN, or by the diaper, or the Green Ecologist, the PT and Convergencia. The possibility of a change in government is hard voters, but independent voters as a server. Those who did not vote for one party, or if by some, are the ones who define and tilt the balance against the party vote drives. If we all heed the call of Javier, 2012 will be defined in all forms and is defined by the vote drives. We anticipate results polls at this time. PRI win Enrique Peña Nieto to the front and keep a majority in Congress as it is today. The PAN will be removed from power and remain in second place and the PRD will be as a third national force. Is it very different to the current situation? The only difference is that now rule again the PRI, as this ruling today by the State of Mexico.
This is not a new debate is a debate that occurred within the left in 2006, including some social organizations of the left and the electoral left. Among the organizations that were near and Javier Sicilia The López Obrador, who headed the leftist electoral option in 2006. Some called the vote not because López Obrador did not mean socialist change in the country, only democratic change and doubted whether it was beneficial to the masses of our country. I remember one of the places in that debate in the auditorium when the Sheimbaum ENAH debated with members of the "Other" and the RPF, and even members of the APPO. She called to vote for AMLO in 2006, while the "Other" and other organizations called to abstain.
On the table was my professor at the UAM doctorate, Dr. Guillermo Almeyra who evaluated the future in this way. If we choose to López Obrador will break the mother said. What drew applause in the auditorium Piña Chan, but he added, if they elect Felipe Calderon is sure to break us. He explained. Is not the same the government of Rafael Videla than Kirchner Kirchner in Argentina there is repression, but that's a few hundred imprisoned for any street protests. With Rafael Videla have more than 25 thousand dead. (Those were the dead of the military dictatorship in Argentina).
Guillermo Almeyra
Did not Guillermo prophet's voice? With Calderon carry more than 30 thousand dead! So the discussion back to 2006. What was the call not to vote for the reformist López Obrador for the Mexicans, by the "Other" and others? Without trying to divide or lack of respect for the positions, why my reflection. Who really broke the mother to the country, if we doubt?
So I do not agree with Javier Sicilia. We must live up to form a national front, without divisions, without sectarianism, in which we ensure the power shift to the left. Let's see how did the National Front for the triumph of the Left in the English Republic in the 30, let's see how did the Labour Party in Brazil to bring Lula, as the Argentines were inclined to Kirchner Videla "No mother will surely break" as prevented ; indigenous fronts Boliva with Evo Morales or Ecuador's Rafael Correa.
The right cries out, not politicians, respondámosle, not their politicians, because we already know enough and have enough with them. Build a national front to rebuild the country, which has a different style. We to the mother, yes! But of those who break our mother and we continue to keep us breaking. Mexican society can change the government, 2006 showed us that the desire for change is great, millions can do it and tip the country into another direction. I will not be responsible any more than I was in 2006 that the law extends back to power

0 comments:

Post a Comment